Type: | Article | |
Title: | Multinational Companies' Policies in Green Transition: Economic and Social Benefits | PDF Article |
Author: | Olga Nosova | |
Orcid: | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8523-7802 | |
On-line: | 30 December 2024 | |
Metrics: | Applied Business: Issues & Solutions 4(2024)16-23 - ISSN 2783-6967. | |
DOI: | 10.57005/ab.2024.4.4 | |
URL: | http://www.applied-business-solutions.eu/h24/2024_4_4.html | |
| ||
Abstract. | The paper analyses the multinational companies’ policies in the green transition and its consequences for the environment, society, and economy. Multinational corporations (MNCs) in green transition operate across numerous nations and sectors and have the resources, and experience in sustainable development. MNCs became increasingly involved in large-scale renewable energy project development, such as wind and solar power, serving as project developers, investors, and technology suppliers. It is already well recognized that MNCs may play a key role in disseminating essential climate change mitigation technologies, particularly the transfer of knowledge and capacities from lead markets to the rest of the globe. The green transition faces many challenges: high costs, regulatory barriers, technological advancements, and costeffectiveness. These approaches explain the global reach of environmental problems and enhance significant changes in green policy. MNCs’ policies contribute to sustainability but face the multiple challenges caused by local regulations in environment protection policy, investment risks and financing constraints, and climate changes. MNCs provide policies in the green transition by integrating sustainability into their business strategies and operations. The legislation, incentives, and supportive frameworks of the subsidiaries’ country destination create the basis for the involvement of MNCs in the green transition. | |
| ||
JEL: | Q50, Q56, Q57. | |
Keywords: | Green transition, sustainability, decarbonization, green technologies. | |
| ||
Citation: | Olga Nosova (2024). Multinational Companies' Policies in Green Transition: Economic and Social Benefits. Applied Business: Issues & Solutions 4(2024)16-23. - ISSN 2783-6967. | |
https://doi.org/10.57005/ab.2024.4.4 | ||
| ||
References. |
1. Gerasimchuk I. (2006) Ecological Practice of Transnational Corporations (In Russ). - The Questions of Economics 9(2006)154-157. - https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2006-9-154-157 2. Afridah, M., Kusuma, N. (2022). An Introduction to Harm Reduction. - https://greennetwork.asia/brief/an-introduction-to-harm-reduction/ 3. OECD (2023). Main Economic Indicators, 12(2023) - OECD Publishing, Paris. - https://doi.org/10.1787/ded67b87-en. 4. Yu, H., Bansal, P., Arjali`es, D. L. (2023). International business is contributing to environmental crises. - Journal International Business Studies 54(2023)1151–1169 - https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00590-y 5. Kim, K. (2021). Civil Resistance in the Shadow of War: Explaining Popular Mobilization against Dams in Myanmar, PhD thesis. - Uppsala University. 6. Amendolagine, V., De Pascale, G., Faccilogo, N. (2021). International capital mobility and corporate tax revenues: How do controlled foreign company rules and innovation shape this relationship. - Economic Modelling 101(2021)105543 7. Streimikiene D., Siksnelyte-Butkiene, I., Balezentis, T. (2024). Low Carbon Transition. Sustainable Agriculture in the European Union. - CRC Press: New York. 334 p. - ISBN 9781032607900. - https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003460589 8. Davy E., Nygaard I., Hansen U.E. (2021). Dual Embeddedness? Innovation Capabilities, Multinational Subsidiaries, and Solar Power Development in South Africa. - Energy Research and Social Science 78. August. - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102145 9. Niemczyk, J.; Trzaska, R.; Wilczynski, M.; Borowski, K.( 2021). Business Models 4.0 Using Network Effects: Case Study of the Cyfrowy Polsat Group. - Sustainability 13, 11570. - https://doi.org/10.3390/ su132111570 10. Sacher W. (2018). Environmental Impacts of Transnational Corporations in Global South. Edited by Paul Cooney, William Sacher Freslon. - Research Political Economy. Vol. 33. Emerald Publishing Limited. November. 11. Jahanger, A., Usman, M., Balsalobre-Lorente (2022). Linking institutional quality to environmental sustainability. Sustainable Development. Vol. 30:1749–17654,5 https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2345 wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/sd 12. Sanchez-Choliz, J., Fatas-Villafranca, F., Jarne, G., Perez-Grasa, I. (2008). Endogenous Cyclical Growth with a Sigmoidal Diffusion of Innovations. - Economics of Innovation and New Technology17(3)(2008)241-268. - https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590601153910 13. Energy prosumers in Europe citizen participation in the energy transition. (2022). EEA Report. No 01/ Copenhagen: European Environment Agency. 14. Strielkowski, W., Kuzmin, E., Vlasov, M., Anvari-Moghaddam, A. (2024). Integrative approaches across green energy technologies: the role of innovations in human capital. Academia Green Energy;1. https://doi.org/10.20935/AcadEnergy6244 15. World Economist Intelligence Unit Limited (2024). Global Insights and Market Intelligence, London. - https://www.eiu.com/n/ 16. EIU’s Business Environment Ranking (2024). - https://www.gstimes.in/current-affairs/eius-business-environment-rankings-ber-2024/ 17. Microsoft (2023). How can we advance sustainability? - 2024 Environmental Sustainability Report - https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-theissues/ 2024/05/15/microsoft-environmental-sustainability-report-2024/ 18. Unilever Sustainability Report – Windo CSR (2023). - https://my.csrwindo.com/company/unilever/dd87459e-48f9-4f20-9e60-3758e2c97114/ 1- environment 19. IKEA Sustainability Report FY23 (2023). - https://www.ikea.com/global/en/our-business/reports/sustainability-report-fy23-240125/#:˜:text=The %20IKEA%20climate%20footprint%20in,to%20the%20baseline%20year%20FY16. 20. Impact Report.(2023). Tesla. - https://www.tesla.com/ns_videos/2023-tesla-impact-report-highlights.pdf 21. Sustainability report 2023. (2023). Siemens. - https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/api/uuid:00095b96-4712-4cd1-b045-19d5df704358/ sustainability-report-fy2023.pdf 22. BP Sustainability Report 2023 (2023). BP. - https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/sustainability/reporting-centre-and-archive/quick-read.html 23. Fedajev A. (2024). Assessing the Sustainable Competitiveness of Balkan Economies Using the Entropy-Based Promethee Method. The Book of Abstracts 16th International Conference “Economies of the Balkan and Eastern European Countries. EBEEC 2024. Vilnius, Lithuania, May 17-19. Propobos Publications, 33. 24. Dornof J. (2023). CO2 Emission Standards for New Passengers Cars and Vans in the European Union. ICCT Policy Update. - International Council on Clean Transportation. 25. Zolfagharinia, H., Zangiabadi, M., Hafezi, M. (2023). How much is enough? Government subsidies in supporting green product development. - European Journal of Operational Research 39(3)(2023)1316-1333. - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.02.011 26. Hussain, F.I. (2020). Green loans: Financing the transition to a low-carbon economy. - Vietnam Investment Review April 27. - https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/climatechange/green-loans-financing-transition-low-carbon-economy 27. Sumera, M., Pakistan, K., Raza, A., Mohammad, A., Jinnah, U. (2023). Green Finance Green Technology Innovation and Financial Development and Their Role in SDG. - Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies 9(3)(2023)421-436. 28. Nosova, O., Grytsenko, A., Lypov, V. (2024). Cooperative Digital Platforms in the Renewable Energy Sector. - In: 16th International Conference "Economies of the Balkan and Eastern European Countries". EBEEC 2024. Vilnius, Lithuania, May 17-19. Book of Abstracts(2024)42-43. 29. Nosova, O., Grytsenko, A., Lypov, V. (2024). Cooperative Digital Platforms in the Renewable Energy Sector. - Intellectual Economics 18(1)(2024)214- 230. - https://doi.org/10.13165/IE-24-18-1-10 |